 |
|
|
Omega-3 meta-analysis of 2006
|
 |
 |
|
|
META-ANALYSIS: a new tool to discredit natural health supplements?
Published: 19th April 2006
The Alliance for Natural Health (ANH) released its rebuttal on 19th April, which sheds a blinding light on this form of analysis as a credible tool on which to base clinical evaluation, as well as the bigger pharma picture running in the background.
Have you been left wondering about recent negative headlines? Could there be a motive for the negative spin that the media insist on inflicting on the natural health industry?
For Dr Robert Verkerk's rebuttal, please click here
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Misquoting media at it again
|
|
|
|
|
MEDIA ATTEMPTS TO DISCREDIT FISH OILS ARE UNSUCCESSFUL
Published:
Media hype has declared omega 3's to be of no use to those at risk of heart disease but the researchers themselves state clearly that "further high quality trials are needed to examine any protective effect of omega 3 fats for those at increased cardiovascular risk, to run for long enough to assess long term events. It is hoped that these issues will have been incorporated into the large studies currently being planned and underway and that further data will be available in the next few years." Fortunately, UK consumers know better than to believe everything they read in the papers and understand that the benefits of fish oil are both numerous and significant.
Please click here for more information
Authors of the meta-analysis on fish oil respond to misquoting media. Click here for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|